Taste as morality
Thou shalt not kill… duh. There can be no argument that simple things we call morals are universal. If they’re not genetically inherited (see http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/04/060404201741.htm and http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080711080957.htm) they’re certainly easily learned from societal norms. It’s in our genetic makeup to conform to certain expectations… we wouldn’t be able to have civilization without that very important trait. There are certain arguments about the minutiae of when life begins, and if it’s right to keep animals solely for our benefit. Some cultures use religion as an excuse to force their will upon others. With the assistance of some made up all powerful authority, we can crush all opposition to our ideas and practices. The only problem with that idea is that eventually reason will win out. It’s just a matter of time.
So, people are basically good, to varying degrees, so what is morality? If it is a quality one possesses that others just might not then it goes beyond mere right and wrong. Morality, I believe, is deeply intwined with the idea of values. Politicians use values as a kind of code for ‘vote for me, I hate liberals, just like you do’ but the word has roots in the concept of worth: what actions are worthy for me to carry out, what endeavors are worth my time, Is it worth my while to see this movie or listen to this music?
What we consume tends to define us as people, in the western culture in particular. What we value most, though, is the idea of self improvement, or improvement of humanity in general. Though the deeds of some politicians are motivated by avarice for money and power, the reason one wishes to influence politics is that they believe they can, at least in the way they see it, improve the world. I do not think that those who do not espouse my views are trying to hold back progress. No political organization works toward the goal of making things worse. Self improvement and progress seem to be the order of the day.
In that way, striving to make the world better, as an idea, is one of the most moral actions one can perform. Those like Mother Theresa, Bill Gates, and countless others that volunteer their time and resources are revered in society in a way that those with mere status are not. While Steve Jobs may represent superior design, to think he’s made a greater contribution to the world than his rival Bill Gates is pure folly. Though you cannot discount Jobs, of course. Design makes our lives better by improving the tasks that we do, helping us connect to one-another. Art helps us understand the human condition in a way that science and simple compassion cannot achieve. Music and Theatre help illuminate truths about human relationships that allow us to be more compassionate towards others by recognizing the demons and angels within ourselves.
If simple morality is basic, it is art and taste that in a sense define who we are. In any society what we consume as art also determines what art flourishes, wether or not it is successful as art. It is by our actions that an artist or an idea thrives in society. In in an ideal world it would be the best ideas that survive and lesser ideas that fall by the wayside, but enter the gatekeepers: the publishers and focus groups, corporate executives that value nothing but good numbers when the quarterly earnings statements come out. It is this system that rewards mediocrity in which we find ourselves. It becomes our moral imperative to seek out and patronize that which is good and revolutionary, despite what comes to us easily over the airwaves and tubes. The more we promote quality in our daily lives, the more quality will surround us.